Research-Raw meat-based diet for pets: a neglected source of human exposure to Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli clones carrying mcr, Portugal, September 2019 to January 2020

Eurosurveillance

The pet industry has evolved in recent decades due to increasing pet populations, stronger human–pet bonds and demand for high-quality pet food products [1,2]. Processed pet food manufactured with various processing methods (e.g. grinding, cooking, extrusion and dehydration) has traditionally been considered microbiological safe and nutritionally suitable for feeding pets [1,3]. However, since some pet owners consider unprocessed food healthier, raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for dogs have gained popularity [1,2,4]. The RMBDs are mainly composed of uncooked or minimally processed meat, bones and organs, with freezing as the primary treatment, and are considered to be more natural than conventional processed pet food [1,5]. Nevertheless, the scientific evidence supporting RMBD benefits is scarce, and many veterinary professional organisations (e.g. the World Small Animal Veterinary Association) and international public health agencies (e.g. the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) view them as potential health hazards for both animals and humans [1,5]; awareness of this issue appears less evident in Europe [6]. The safety concerns associated with RMBDs are related to the potential contamination of raw ingredients with zoonotic pathogenic bacteria and parasites [1,3,4]. Such contamination could lead to the spread of these pathogens to both pets and humans cohabitating with pets, through direct contact with the pet or its feed, or indirectly through contact with contaminated household surfaces or hands during feed preparation.

In the European Union (EU), legal requirements for the use of animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption are established, including those to produce processed or raw pet food, helping to ensure microbiological safety [7]. Nevertheless, since 2020, there have been more than 20 notifications or recalls of pet food and RMBD in the EU due to the detection of zoonotic pathogens, particularly  and pathogenic  [8], and also cases of human infections with  and Shiga toxin-producing  (STEC) linked to exposure to RMBDs [911]. Several studies have also established a correlation between the microbiota of pets and their owners, including the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains, with pet food as a potential source [12,13]. However, certain antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes of public health concern, such as the  gene conferring resistance to the last-line antibiotic colistin, have not been extensively studied in pet food and RMBDs [1,1416]. Consequently, these antibiotic-resistant strains and genes have not been recognised as notable food safety issues in the context of the pet food industry [6]. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to investigate the occurrence of and further characterise  and other  resistant to critical antibiotics, such as colistin, in dog food, including RMBDs, that is available in stores in Portugal to investigate if they represent a possible source of these hazards to public health.

Research – Microbiological Risks of Traditional Raw Cow’s Milk Cheese (Koryciński Cheeses)

MDPI

Abstract

Traditional and regional foods have been increasing in popularity among consumers in Poland for many years. The observed trend of searching for natural and authentic taste encourages many producers to craft products from raw milk, including Koryciński cheeses. The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological hazards resulting from the presence of pathogenic bacteria in Koryciński cheeses available in retail trade. The tests were carried out using accredited methods, including the detection of the presence of Salmonella spp., the enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes, the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci, and the detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins in food when the number of coagulase-positive staphylococci in the sample exceeded the limit of 105 cfu/g. The research material consisted of 45 Koryciński cheeses. The tests conducted revealed that Salmonella spp. was not detected in any of the examined cheeses. However, coagulase-positive staphylococci were present in 68.9% of the samples. In as many as 15 tested cheeses, the level of S. aureus contamination was above 105 cfu/g; therefore, these samples were tested for the presence of staphylococcal enterotoxins. The presence of staphylococcal enterotoxins was found in one Koryciński cheese. In four cheeses, the number of L. monocytogenes exceeded the level of 102 cfu/g, the limit specified in Regulation 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. The obtained research results confirm the validity of monitoring the microbiological quality of Koryciński cheeses and the need to increase awareness of ensuring proper hygienic conditions of production, including the increased risk associated with unpasteurized milk products.

Research – Modelling Growth Kinetics of Escherichia coli and Background Microflora in Hydroponically Grown Lettuce

MDPI

Abstract

Hydroponic cultivation of lettuce is an increasingly popular sustainable agricultural technique. However, Escherichia coli, a prevalent bacterium, poses significant concerns for the quality and safety of hydroponically grown lettuce. This study aimed to develop a growth model for E. coli and background microflora in hydroponically grown lettuce. The experiment involved inoculating hydroponically grown lettuce with E. coli and incubated at 4, 10, 15, 25, 30, 36 °C. Growth models for E. coli and background microflora were then developed using Origin 2022 (9.9) and IPMP 2013 software and validated at 5 °C and 20 °C by calculating root mean square errors (RMSEs). The result showed that E. coli was unable to grow at 4 °C and the SGompertz model was determined as the most appropriate primary model. From this primary model, the Ratkowsky square root model and polynomial model were derived as secondary models for E. coli-R168 and background microflora, respectively. These secondary models determined that the minimum temperature (Tmin) required for the growth of E. coli and background microflora in hydroponically grown lettuce was 6.1 °C and 8.7 °C, respectively. Moreover, the RMSE values ranged from 0.11 to 0.24 CFU/g, indicating that the models and their associated kinetic parameters accurately represented the proliferation of E. coli and background microflora in hydroponically grown lettuce.

ECDC – Facts on Ciguatera fish poisoning

ECDC

Ciguatera poisoning (CP) is caused by consumption of fish that have accumulated ciguatoxins in their flesh. CP is endemic in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and the Caribbean Sea. Isolated outbreaks have occurred sporadically in Europe but with an increasing frequency in temperate areas like the Canary Islands, Spain.

CP is not under routine surveillance in the European Union (EU), but unexpected, potentially serious cross-border biological threats to health are monitored by ECDC [1]. Cases are usually not notified in national surveillance systems but may be reported to national poisoning centres.

Ciguatoxins

Ciguatoxins (CTXs) are temperature-stable, so they are not destroyed by cooking or by freezing the fish. Furthermore, the toxins are colourless, odourless, and flavourless, which make it impossible to taste or smell them [2,3].

Transmission

CP is caused by the consumption of herbivorous fish that feed on toxic microalgae (Gambierdiscus spp. and Fukuyoa spp.), which are attached to macrophytes or dead corals, and from carnivorous fish that have consumed toxic herbivorous fish [3,4].

Over 400 known fish species from tropical and subtropical waters have been classified as potential carriers of CTXs. Examples of the fish most frequently associated with cases of CP include barracuda, grouper, amberjack, snapper, moray eel, hogfish, mackerel, surgeonfish, and parrotfish. Greater severity of illness is associated with eating fish head or organs. It is therefore advisable to avoid consuming visceral organs, roe (fish eggs), and carcasses (e.g. heads, eyes, and bones) of these fish species [4-6].

Person-to-person transmission of CTXs is extremely rare, but transmission of toxin from mother to child during breastfeeding or across the placenta, as well as during sexual intercourse, has been described [6-10].

Clinical features and sequelae

Intoxication of humans occurs via consumption of fish containing CTXs. In humans, CTXs activate voltage-gated sodium channels in cell membranes, increasing sodium ion permeability and depolarizing the nerve cell. Clinical presentation varies according to the individual characteristics and the geographical origin of the CTXs. Gastrointestinal symptoms can precede or accompany neurological symptoms, which usually appear two to 48 hours after eating the contaminated fish. Symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, paraesthesia of lips, tongue and extremities, cold allodynia (burning pain caused by a normally innocuous cold stimulus), a metallic taste in the mouth, arthralgia, myalgia, pruritus without urticaria or erythema, muscle weakness, blurred vision, painful intercourse, hypotension, and bradycardia [4,8,11].

Cold allodynia is characteristic of CP, although it is not present in all patients. Neurological symptoms usually resolve within weeks, although some symptoms can last for months. Recurrent symptoms can occur following the ingestion of certain food or beverages such as alcohol, nuts, or non-toxic fish. CP is rarely fatal, but death can occur in severe cases due to severe dehydration, cardiovascular shock, or respiratory failure [4,8,11].

Research – FDA Publishes Landmark Final Rule to Enhance the Safety of Agricultural Water

FDA

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final rule on agricultural water that represents an important step toward enhancing the safety of produce. The revised requirements are intended to enhance public health by improving the safety of water used in produce cultivation. The revisions are also designed to be practical across various agricultural water systems, uses, and practices, while remaining adaptable to future advancements in agricultural water quality science.

The final rule replaces certain pre-harvest agricultural water requirements for covered produce (other than sprouts) in the 2015 produce safety rule with requirements for systems-based agricultural water assessments to determine and guide appropriate measures to minimize potential risks associated with pre-harvest agricultural water. Specifically, this rule:

  • Establishes requirements for agricultural water assessments that evaluate a variety of factors that are key determinants of contamination risks associated with pre-harvest agricultural water. This includes an evaluation of the water system, water use practices, crop characteristics, environmental conditions, potential impacts on water from adjacent and nearby land, and other relevant factors.
  • Includes testing pre-harvest agricultural water as part of an assessment in certain circumstances.
  • Requires farms to implement effective mitigation measures within specific timeframes based on findings from their assessments. Hazards related to certain activities associated with adjacent and nearby land uses are subject to expedited mitigation.
  • Adds new options for mitigation measures, providing farms with additional flexibility in responding to findings from their pre-harvest agricultural water assessments.

Farms are required to conduct assessments of their pre-harvest agricultural water annually, and whenever a significant change occurs, to identify any conditions likely to introduce known or reasonably foreseeable hazards into or onto covered produce or food contact surfaces.

These revised requirements reflect recent science, findings from investigations of several produce-related outbreaks, and feedback from a variety of stakeholders on the agricultural water requirements in the Produce Safety Rule, which were previously published in 2015. These revisions will more comprehensively address a known route of microbial contamination that can lead to preventable foodborne illness.

Research – Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli in Uncooked Meat Purchased from Large Chain Grocery Stores and in Raw Dog Food Purchased From Pet Stores in the Same City

BIORXIV

Abstract

Although previous studies have associated feeding dogs uncooked meat with their carriage and excretion of antibiotic resistant (ABR) Escherichia coli, this practice remains popular amongst dog owners in some countries, including the UK. Uncooked meat fed to dogs is purchased from stores selling meat primarily for human consumption, or it is a brand of commercial raw dog food (RDF), which is commonly sold frozen and thawed prior to feeding. We tested 58 packets of uncooked meat (beef, chicken, lamb and pork) purchased from large chain grocery stores (15 stores) and 15 packets of thawed, chicken-based RDF (11 brands) for the presence of ABR E. coli. All samples were purchased from the city of Bristol, UK. Among grocery store-purchased meat, chicken samples were significantly more likely to be positive for E. coli resistant to amoxicillin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, and the critically important antibiotics cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin, than other types of meat. When comparing grocery store chicken to chicken-based RDF we found no significant difference in sample-level positivity for resistant E. coli, which, for RDF was 80% (amoxicillin), 80% (spectinomycin), 87% (streptomycin), 27% (amoxicillin-clavulanate), 27% (cefotaxime) and 47% (ciprofloxacin). We conclude that despite it having been purchased frozen and thawed prior to testing according to the manufacturer’s instructions, contamination of RDF with ABR E. coli is similar to that of uncooked meat primarily intended for human consumption after cooking, and so the same strict hygiene practices are advised when handling RDF as uncooked meat. Our findings provide a rationale to explain why feeding uncooked meat or RDF to dogs in the city of Bristol is associated with them excreting E. coli resistant to critically important antibiotics.

Research – Opportunistic Pathogens in Drinking Water Distribution Systems—A Review

MDPI

Abstract

In contrast to “frank” pathogens, like Salmonella entrocoliticaShigella dysenteriae, and Vibrio cholerae, that always have a probability of disease, “opportunistic” pathogens are organisms that cause an infectious disease in a host with a weakened immune system and rarely in a healthy host. Historically, drinking water treatment has focused on control of frank pathogens, particularly those from human or animal sources (like Giardia lambliaCryptosporidium parvum, or Hepatitis A virus), but in recent years outbreaks from drinking water have increasingly been due to opportunistic pathogens. Characteristics of opportunistic pathogens that make them problematic for water treatment include: (1) they are normally present in aquatic environments, (2) they grow in biofilms that protect the bacteria from disinfectants, and (3) under appropriate conditions in drinking water systems (e.g., warm water, stagnation, low disinfectant levels, etc.), these bacteria can amplify to levels that can pose a public health risk. The three most common opportunistic pathogens in drinking water systems are Legionella pneumophilaMycobacterium avium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This report focuses on these organisms to provide information on their public health risk, occurrence in drinking water systems, susceptibility to various disinfectants, and other operational practices (like flushing and cleaning of pipes and storage tanks). In addition, information is provided on a group of nine other opportunistic pathogens that are less commonly found in drinking water systems, including Aeromonas hydrophilaKlebsiella pneumoniaeSerratia marcescensBurkholderia pseudomalleiAcinetobacter baumanniiStenotrophomonas maltophiliaArcobacter butzleri, and several free-living amoebae including Naegleria fowleri and species of Acanthamoeba. The public health risk for these microbes in drinking water is still unclear, but in most cases, efforts to manage Legionella, mycobacteria, and Pseudomonas risks will also be effective for these other opportunistic pathogens. The approach to managing opportunistic pathogens in drinking water supplies focuses on controlling the growth of these organisms. Many of these microbes are normal inhabitants in biofilms in water, so the attention is less on eliminating these organisms from entering the system and more on managing their occurrence and concentrations in the pipe network. With anticipated warming trends associated with climate change, the factors that drive the growth of opportunistic pathogens in drinking water systems will likely increase. It is important, therefore, to evaluate treatment barriers and management activities for control of opportunistic pathogen risks. Controls for primary treatment, particularly for turbidity management and disinfection, should be reviewed to ensure adequacy for opportunistic pathogen control. However, the major focus for the utility’s opportunistic pathogen risk reduction plan is the management of biological activity and biofilms in the distribution system. Factors that influence the growth of microbes (primarily in biofilms) in the distribution system include, temperature, disinfectant type and concentration, nutrient levels (measured as AOC or BDOC), stagnation, flushing of pipes and cleaning of storage tank sediments, and corrosion control. Pressure management and distribution system integrity are also important to the microbial quality of water but are related more to the intrusion of contaminants into the distribution system rather than directly related to microbial growth. Summarizing the identified risk from drinking water, the availability and quality of disinfection data for treatment, and guidelines or standards for control showed that adequate information is best available for management of L. pneumophila. For L. pneumophila, the risk for this organism has been clearly established from drinking water, cases have increased worldwide, and it is one of the most identified causes of drinking water outbreaks. Water management best practices (e.g., maintenance of a disinfectant residual throughout the distribution system, flushing and cleaning of sediments in pipelines and storage tanks, among others) have been shown to be effective for control of L. pneumophila in water supplies. In addition, there are well documented management guidelines available for the control of the organism in drinking water distribution systems. By comparison, management of risks for Mycobacteria from water are less clear than for L. pneumophila. Treatment of M. avium is difficult due to its resistance to disinfection, the tendency to form clumps, and attachment to surfaces in biofilms. Additionally, there are no guidelines for management of M. avium in drinking water, and one risk assessment study suggested a low risk of infection. The role of tap water in the transmission of the other opportunistic pathogens is less clear and, in many cases, actions to manage L. pneumophila (e.g., maintenance of a disinfectant residual, flushing, cleaning of storage tanks, etc.) will also be beneficial in helping to manage these organisms as well.

Research – Biological Control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Dairy Manure-Based Compost Using Competitive Exclusion Microorganisms

MDPI

Abstract

Background: Animal manure-based compost is a valuable organic fertilizer and biological soil amendment. To ensure the microbiological safety of compost products, the effectiveness of competitive exclusion microorganisms (CE) in reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 in dairy manure-based compost was evaluated. Methods: A cocktail of E. coli O157:H7 strains were inoculated into dairy compost along with CE strains isolated from compost, and the reduction in E. coli O157:H7 by CE was determined in compost with 20%, 30%, and 40% moisture levels at 22 °C and 30 °C under laboratory conditions, as well as in fall, winter, and summer seasons under greenhouse settings. Results: Under lab conditions, CE addition resulted in 1.1–3.36 log reductions in E. coli O157:H7 in compost, with enhanced pathogen reduction by higher moisture and lower temperature. In the greenhouse, >99% of the E. coli O157:H7 population in compost with ≥30% moisture due to cross-contamination can be effectively inactivated by CE within 2 days during colder seasons. However, it took ≥8 days to achieve the same level of reduction for heat-adapted E. coli O157:H7 cells. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the competitive exclusion of microorganisms can be an effective tool for controlling foodborne pathogens in compost and reducing the potential for soil and crop contamination.

Research – Exploring Propolis as a Sustainable Bio-Preservative Agent to Control Foodborne Pathogens in Vacuum-Packed Cooked Ham

MDPI

Abstract

The search for natural food additives makes propolis an exciting alternative due to its known antimicrobial activity. This work aims to investigate propolis’ behaviour as a nitrite substitute ingredient in cooked ham (a ready-to-eat product) when confronted with pathogenic microorganisms of food interest. The microbial evolution of Listeria monocytogenesStaphylococcus aureusBacillus cereus, and Clostridium sporogenes inoculated at known doses was examined in different batches of cooked ham. The design of a challenge test according to their shelf life (45 days), pH values, and water activity allowed the determination of the mesophilic aerobic flora, psychotropic, and acid lactic bacteria viability. The test was completed with an organoleptic analysis of the samples, considering possible alterations in colour and texture. The cooked ham formulation containing propolis instead of nitrites limited the potential growth (δ < 0.5 log10) of all the inoculated microorganisms until day 45, except for L. monocytogenes, which in turn exhibited a bacteriostatic effect between day 7 and 30 of the storage time. The sensory analysis revealed the consumer’s acceptance of cooked ham batches including propolis as a natural additive. These findings suggest the functionality of propolis as a promising alternative to artificial preservatives for ensuring food safety and reducing the proliferation risk of foodborne pathogens in ready-to-eat products.

Research – Enhancing Escherichia coli Inactivation: Synergistic Mechanism of Ultraviolet Light and High-Voltage Electric Field

MDPI

Abstract

This study investigated the bactericidal effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, a high-voltage electric field (HVEF), and their combination on Escherichia coli. The results indicated that UV and combined disinfection were more effective with longer exposure, leading to significant reductions in microbial activity. Specifically, the single UV disinfection alone reduced activity by 3.3 log after 5 min, while combined disinfection achieved a 4.2 log reduction. In contrast, short-term HVEF treatment did not exhibit significant bactericidal effects, only achieving a reduction of 0.17 log in 5 min. Furthermore, prolonged exposure to both UV disinfection and an HVEF was found to damage cell membranes, ultimately causing cell death, while shorter durations did not. Despite rapid cell count decreases, flow cytometry did not detect apoptotic or necrotic cells, likely due to rapid cell rupture. This study suggests that combining UV radiation and an HVEF could be a promising approach for inhibiting bacterial reproduction, with HVEF enhancing UV effects. These findings provide insights for using combined HVEF and UV disinfection in food safety and preservation.